点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
四川：春运总量将达9239万人次 目前总体有序平稳安全******
中新网成都1月18日电 (记者 王鹏)四川省政府新闻办18日在成都举行“欢乐川味年—畅快出行通途四川”新闻发布会。记者从现场获悉，今年四川春运总量将达到9239万人次，较去年上升36%。目前，四川春运总体有序平稳安全。
四川省交通运输厅副厅长宁坚介绍，今年春运形势复杂、任务艰巨，客流复苏反弹，运输保障压力大。主要集中在春节期间和节后，特别是大年初六和元宵节前后将分别迎来“返岗流”和“务工流”“学生流”等客流高峰。据预测，公路、铁路、民航、水路分别约占客流总量的70.35%、20.56%、7.35%、1.74%。
记者了解到，自春运开启以来，在便捷春运方面，四川民航、铁路优化了购票候乘等便民举措，交通、人社部门推出农民工返乡“春风行动+金通工程”一票制服务，高速公路服务区新增充电车位约700个，保障新能源车的出行。
此外，为确保重点物资运输通畅，四川省道路运输部门继续坚持省市县三级物流保通保畅机制，严格执行“一事一协调”、督办转办、7×24小时值班值守制度，及时解决重点物资运输受阻问题；邮政部门春节期间“不打烊”，保障春运期间医疗民生物资寄递不中断。
宁坚介绍，目前四川省春运总体有序平稳安全，未发生重大及以上安全事故、未发生大面积长时间道路拥堵、未发生重大服务质量投诉及重大负面舆情。
截至1月17日，四川全省完成旅客发送1926.1万人次，占全国总量的4.5%，同比2022年增长7.2%，达到2019年同期的57.6%。其中，公路客运量占了总量的一半左右，发送旅客1172.7万人次，达到2019年同期的47.2%，较2022年同期增长了1.3%；铁路发送旅客506.9万人次，比2019年同期仅低2.7%；民航发送旅客207.9万人次，比2019年同期高8个百分点；高速公路小客车流量一直在增长，已达日均244.8万辆次，分别比2019年、2022年同期增长27%、4.2%。
道路运输方面，四川省交通运输厅道路运输管理局一级调研员魏平表示，四川春运期间全力保障运力，通过检测，符合条件的客车全部投入春运，共计有常规运力30.8万辆、应急运力7000辆，基本能够保障群众出行需求。
四川省交通运输厅副厅长宁坚发布四川春运情况。 四川省政府新闻办供图此外，四川道路运输重点服务5大客流：民工返乡返岗、农村地区走亲访友、景区景点出游、枢纽场站中转换乘、个性化高端出行。其中投入406辆超长客运车辆，开行专车，让民工可以“出厂门、上车门、进家门”；投入2.7万辆农村客运车辆，因地制宜采取班线运行、片区运行、包车服务、预约出行等方式，让走亲访友更便捷、更舒心。
民航方面，民航四川监管局运输处处长崔堂民介绍，今年春运首日成都两场执行客运航班1163班，已超过2019年疫情前双流机场春运首日航班量。民航运输高峰预计出现在这三周，全省机场日均旅客吞吐量将突破20万人次。
“为了应对激增的客流，各航空公司积极采取调配运力、调整大机型、安排加飞等措施，在成都双流国际机场、成都天府国际机场、泸州、宜宾、绵阳等热门机场加密航线。”崔堂民说，同时四川民航各单位积极推进国际/地区客运航线的复航，根据旅客需求加密航线班次，最大限度地满足人民群众出行需求。截至目前，成都国际(地区)客运航线已恢复至24条，居全国第四，中西部第一。双流机场已陆续恢复进港航班70余架次。香港、澳门每周计划航班已基本接近疫情前水平。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)